Manuscripts that do not adhere to the guidelines for submission will be returned to the corresponding author for technical revision before undergoing the peer review process. Manuscripts with insufficient priority for publication will be rejected promptly.

Peer review is the process we use to assess the quality of a manuscript to see if it is suitable for publication. Independent researchers with similar competencies assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity, and importance to help our Editors determine if a manuscript is suitable for publication in the journal.

This journal uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers and vice versa, throughout the review process.

Submitted original research articles are reviewed by two referees. They will evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically logical and well-constructed, focusing specifically on if it duplicates previously published work, and if there are clear grounds for it to be considered for publication.

All correspondence related to the submission, including editorial decisions, will be sent by email to the corresponding author. In case of revision, detailed revision instructions will be sent and a point-by-point response will be required. The Journal does not reveal the identity of its reviewers.

Authors can check the status of their manuscript at any time by logging into the journal's submission system, Editorial Manager.